Sideway
output.to from Sideway
`-=[]โŸจโŸฉ\;',./~!@#$%^&*()_+{}|:"<>? ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘๐‘‘๐‘’๐‘“๐‘”โ„Ž๐‘–๐‘—๐‘˜๐‘™๐‘š๐‘›๐‘œ๐‘๐‘ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘ข๐‘ฃ๐‘ค๐‘ฅ๐‘ฆ๐‘ง ร…โ€‰โˆ’โ€‚ร—โ€ƒโ‹…โˆ“ยฑโˆ˜๊žŠ๏นฆโˆ—โˆ™ โ„ฏ ๐”ธ๐”นโ„‚๐”ป๐”ผ๐”ฝ๐”พโ„๐•€๐•๐•‚๐•ƒ๐•„โ„•๐•†โ„™โ„šโ„๐•Š๐•‹๐•Œ๐•๐•Ž๐•๐•โ„ค๐ด๐ต๐ถ๐ท๐ธ๐น๐บ๐ป๐ผ๐ฝ๐พ๐ฟ๐‘€๐‘๐‘‚๐‘ƒ๐‘„๐‘…๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘ˆ๐‘‰๐‘Š๐‘‹๐‘Œ๐‘ โˆผโˆฝโˆพโ‰โ‰‚โ‰ƒโ‰„โ‰…โ‰†โ‰‡โ‰ˆโ‰‰โ‰Œโ‰โ‰ โ‰ก โ‰คโ‰ฅโ‰ฆโ‰งโ‰จโ‰ฉโ‰ชโ‰ซ โˆˆโˆ‰โˆŠโˆ‹โˆŒโˆ โŠ‚โŠƒโŠ„โŠ…โІโЇ ๐›ผ๐›ฝ๐›พ๐›ฟ๐œ€๐œ๐œ‚๐œƒ๐œ„๐œ…๐œ†๐œ‡๐œˆ๐œ‰๐œŠ๐œ‹๐œŒ๐œŽ๐œ๐œ๐œ‘๐œ’๐œ“๐œ” โˆ€โˆ‚โˆƒโˆ…โฆฐโˆ†โˆ‡โˆŽโˆžโˆโˆดโˆต โˆโˆโˆ‘โ‹€โ‹โ‹‚โ‹ƒ โˆงโˆจโˆฉโˆช โˆซโˆฌโˆญโˆฎโˆฏโˆฐโˆฑโˆฒโˆณ โˆฅโ‹ฎโ‹ฏโ‹ฐโ‹ฑ โ€– โ€ฒ โ€ณ โ€ด โ„ โ— สน สบ โ€ต โ€ถ โ€ท ๏น ๏น‚ ๏นƒ ๏น„ ๏ธน ๏ธบ ๏ธป ๏ธผ ๏ธ— ๏ธ˜ ๏ธฟ ๏น€ ๏ธฝ ๏ธพ ๏น‡ ๏นˆ ๏ธท ๏ธธ โœ   โ   โŽด  โŽต  โž   โŸ   โ    โก โ†โ†‘โ†’โ†“โ†คโ†ฆโ†ฅโ†งโ†”โ†•โ†–โ†—โ†˜โ†™โ–ฒโ–ผโ—€โ–ถโ†บโ†ปโŸฒโŸณ โ†ผโ†ฝโ†พโ†ฟโ‡€โ‡โ‡‚โ‡ƒโ‡„โ‡…โ‡†โ‡‡ โ‡โ‡‘โ‡’โ‡“โ‡”โ‡Œโ‡โ‡โ‡•โ‡–โ‡—โ‡˜โ‡™โ‡™โ‡ณโฅขโฅฃโฅคโฅฅโฅฆโฅงโฅจโฅฉโฅชโฅซโฅฌโฅญโฅฎโฅฏ
Draft for Information Only

Content

Analytic Function
โ€ƒ Analytic Function with Zero Derivative
โ€ƒConsequences
โ€ƒAnalytic Functions with Constant Norm
โ€ƒA Strange Example

source/reference:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaTLkDn9_1Wy5TRYfVULYUw/playlists

Analytic Function

Analytic Function with Zero Derivative

By theorem. If ๐‘“ is analytic on a domain ๐ท, if ๐‘“โ€ฒ(๐‘ง)=0 for all ๐‘งโˆˆ๐ท, then ๐‘“ is constant in ๐ท.

Recall the 1-dimensional analog:

By Fact, if ๐‘“(๐‘Ž,๐‘)โ†’โ„ is differentiable and satisfies ๐‘“โ€ฒ(๐‘ฅ)=0 for all ๐‘ฅโˆˆ(๐‘Ž,๐‘), then ๐‘“ is constant on (๐‘Ž,๐‘).

Idea of proof

  • First, show that ๐‘“ is constant in any disk ๐ต๐‘Ÿ(๐‘Ž), contained in ๐ท, using 1-dimensional fact.
  • Second, use the fact that ๐ท is connected and the first fact to show that ๐‘“ is constant in ๐ท.

Main steps

  1. First step. Let ๐ต๐‘Ÿ(๐‘Ž) be a disk contained in ๐ท, and let ๐‘โˆˆ๐ต๐‘Ÿ(๐‘Ž). Pick the point ๐‘โˆˆ๐ต๐‘Ÿ(๐‘Ž) as in the picture. Since ๐‘“โ€ฒ(๐‘ง)=0 in ๐ท, then ๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=๐‘ข๐‘ฆ=๐‘ฃ๐‘ฅ=๐‘ฃ๐‘ฆ=0 in ๐ท. In particular, look at ๐‘ข on the horizontal segment from ๐‘Ž to ๐‘. It depends only on one parameter (namely ๐‘ฅ) there, and ๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=0. By the 1-dimensional fact, ๐‘ข is constant on the line segment, in particular, ๐‘ข(๐‘Ž)=๐‘ข(๐‘). Similarly, ๐‘ข(๐‘)=๐‘ข(๐‘), thus ๐‘ข(๐‘Ž)=๐‘ข(๐‘). Since ๐‘ was an arbitrary point in ๐ต๐‘Ÿ(๐‘Ž), ๐‘ข is thus constant in ๐ต๐‘Ÿ(๐‘Ž). Similarly, ๐‘ฃ, is constant in ๐ต๐‘Ÿ(๐‘Ž), thus ๐‘“ is constant in ๐ต๐‘Ÿ(๐‘Ž).
  2. Second step. Let ๐‘Ž and ๐‘ be two arbitrary points in ๐ท. Since ๐ท is connected, there exist a nice curve in ๐ท, joining ๐‘Ž and ๐‘. By the previous step, ๐‘“ is constant in the disk around the point ๐‘Ž (see picture). Furthermore, ๐‘“ is also constant in the neighboring disk. Since these two disks overlap, the two constants must agree. continue on in this matter until reaching ๐‘. Therefore, ๐‘“(๐‘Ž)=๐‘“(๐‘). Thus ๐‘“ is constant in ๐ท.

Consequences

The previous theorem, together with the Cauchy-Riemann equations, has strong consequences.

  • Suppose that ๐‘“=๐‘ข+๐‘–๐‘ฃ is analytic in a domain ๐ท. Suppose furthermore, that ๐‘ข is constant in ๐ท. Then ๐‘“ must be constant in ๐ท.

    Proof: ๐‘ข constant in ๐ท implies that ๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=๐‘ข๐‘ฆ=0 in ๐ท. Since ๐‘“ is analytic, the Cauchy-Riemann equations now imply that ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฅ=๐‘ฃ๐‘ฆ=0 as well. Thus ๐‘“โ€ฒ=๐‘ข๐‘ฅ+๐‘–๐‘ฃ๐‘ฅ=0 in ๐ท. By our theorem, ๐‘“ is constant in ๐ท.

  • Similarly, if ๐‘“=๐‘ข+๐‘–๐‘ฃ is analytic in a domain ๐ท with ๐‘ฃ being constant, then ๐‘“ must be constant in ๐ท.
  • Suppose next that ๐‘“=๐‘ข+๐‘–๐‘ฃ is analytic in a domain ๐ท with |๐‘“| being constant in ๐ท. This too implies that ๐‘“ itself must be constant.

Analytic Functions with Constant Norm

Let ๐‘“=๐‘ข+๐‘–๐‘ฃ be analytic in a domain ๐ท, and suppose that |๐‘“| is constant in ๐ท. Then |๐‘“|2 is also constant, i.e. there exists ๐‘โˆˆโ„‚ such that

|๐‘“(๐‘ง)|2=๐‘ข2(๐‘ง)+๐‘ฃ2(๐‘ง)=๐‘ for all ๐‘งโˆˆ๐ท
  • If ๐‘=0 then ๐‘ข and ๐‘ฃ must be equal to zero everywhere, and so ๐‘“ is equal to zero in ๐ท.
  • If ๐‘โ‰ 0 then in fact ๐‘>0. Taking the partial derivative with respect to ๐‘ฅ (and similarly with respect to ๐‘ฆ) of the above equation yields:

    2๐‘ข๐‘ข๐‘ฅ+2๐‘ฃ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฅ=0 and 2๐‘ข๐‘ข๐‘ฆ+2๐‘ฃ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฆ=0

    Substituting ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฅ=โˆ’๐‘ข๐‘ฆ in the first and ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฆ=๐‘ข๐‘ฅ in the second equation gives

    ๐‘ข๐‘ข๐‘ฅโˆ’๐‘ฃ๐‘ข๐‘ฆ=0 and ๐‘ข๐‘ข๐‘ฆ+๐‘ฃ๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=0

    Multiplying the first equation by ๐‘ข and the second by ๐‘ฃ, find

    ๐‘ข2๐‘ข๐‘ฅโˆ’๐‘ข๐‘ฃ๐‘ข๐‘ฆ=0 and ๐‘ข๐‘ฃ๐‘ข๐‘ฆ+๐‘ฃ2๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=0

    Add the twoe equations

    ๐‘ข2๐‘ข๐‘ฅ+๐‘ฃ2๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=0

    Since ๐‘ข2+๐‘ฃ2=๐‘, this last equation becomes

    ๐‘๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=0

    But ๐‘>0, so it must be the case that ๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=0 in ๐ท. And, ๐‘ข๐‘ฆ=0 in ๐ท can be found similarly. Using the Cauchy-riemann equations, ๐‘ข๐‘ฅ=๐‘ฃ๐‘ฆ=0 in ๐ท can be obtained. Hence ๐‘“โ€ฒ(๐‘ง)=0 in ๐ท, and the theorem yields that ๐‘“ is constant in ๐ท. Note: The assumption of ๐ท being connected is important.

A Strange Example

Let

๐‘“:โ„‚โ†’โ„‚, ๐‘“(๐‘ง)={๐‘’-1๐‘ง4, ๐‘งโ‰ 00, ๐‘ง=0
  • One can find ๐‘ข, ๐‘ฃ, ๐‘ข๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ข๐‘ฆ, ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฅ, ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฆ and they actually satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations in โ„‚.
  • Clearly, ๐‘“ is analytic in โ„‚\{0}.
  • At the origin, one can show that ๐‘ข๐‘ฅ(0)=๐‘ข๐‘ฆ(0)=๐‘ข๐‘ฅ(0)=๐‘ข๐‘ฆ(0)=0
  • However, ๐‘“ is not differentiable at 0. How is this possible?
  • The function ๐‘“ isn't even continuous at the origin.
  • Consider ๐‘ง approaching the origin along the real axis, i.e. ๐‘ง=๐‘ฅ+๐‘–โ‹…0โ†’0. Then

    ๐‘“(๐‘ง)=๐‘“(๐‘ฅ)=๐‘’-1๐‘ฅ4โ†’0
  • Next, consider ๐‘ง approaching the origin along the imaginary zxis, i.e. ๐‘ง=0+๐‘–๐‘ฆโ†’0. Then

    ๐‘“(๐‘ง)=๐‘“(๐‘–๐‘ฆ)=๐‘’-1๐‘–4๐‘ฆ4โ†’0
  • However, consider ๐‘ง=๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘–๐œ‹4โ†’0. Then ๐‘ง4=๐‘Ÿ4๐‘’๐‘–๐œ‹4โ‹…4=-๐‘Ÿ4, so

    ๐‘“(๐‘ง)=๐‘’-1-๐‘Ÿ4=๐‘’1๐‘Ÿ4โ†’โˆžโ‰ ๐‘“(0)

Although the functions ๐‘ข and ๐‘ฃ satisfy theCauchy-Riemann equations, yet, ๐‘“ is not differentable at the origin. This is because the partial derivatives are not continuous at 0, so the assumptions of the theorem of Cauchy-Riemann equations are not satisified.


ยฉsideway

ID: 190400012 Last Updated: 4/12/2019 Revision: 0


Latest Updated LinksValid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS!Nu Html Checker Firefox53 Chromena IExplorerna
IMAGE

Home 5

Business

Management

HBR 3

Information

Recreation

Hobbies 9

Culture

Chinese 1097

English 339

Travel 38

Reference 79

Hardware 55

Computer

Hardware 259

Software

Application 213

Digitization 37

Latex 52

Manim 205

KB 1

Numeric 19

Programming

Web 290new

Unicode 504

HTML 66new

Common Color 1new

Html Entity (Unicode) 1new

Html 401 Special 1

CSS 65new

Selector 1

SVG 46

ASP.NET 270

OS 447new

MS Windows

Windows10 1new

.NET Framework 1

DeskTop 7

Python 72

Knowledge

Mathematics

Formulas 8

Set 1

Logic 1

Algebra 84

Number Theory 207new

Trigonometry 31

Geometry 34

Coordinate Geometry 2

Calculus 67

Complex Analysis 21

Engineering

Tables 8

Mechanical

Mechanics 1

Rigid Bodies

Statics 92

Dynamics 37

Fluid 5

Fluid Kinematics 5

Control

Process Control 1

Acoustics 19

FiniteElement 2

Natural Sciences

Matter 1

Electric 27

Biology 1

Geography 1


Copyright © 2000-2026 Sideway . All rights reserved Disclaimers last modified on 06 September 2019